I believe the current board of directors has not been effective in the planning, execution and funding of the projects they have handled. This site is created by Les Mower to provide communication about the operation and management of our investment in Monterey Condominiums.

Monday, September 14, 2026 Les Mower General Information 97
Broken Windows Theory (Often Called “Broken Window Syndrome”) The Broken Windows Theory is the idea that when small signs of neglect or disorder are ignored, bigger problems can develop. The name comes from an example: If a building has a broken window and nobody repairs it, people may think nobody cares about the property. As a result, more windows may be broken, graffiti may appear, and the area may become less safe. In simple terms: Small problems that are ignored can lead to larger problems over time. Examples A broken window that is not repaired. Litter collecting on sidewalks. Graffiti left on walls. Abandoned buildings or poorly maintained properties. When these conditions remain unchecked, they may encourage further neglect or misbehavior. Results and Impact Supporters of the theory believe that: Keeping neighborhoods clean and well maintained can discourage crime. Promptly fixing small problems helps create a sense of pride and community. People are more likely to respect areas that appear cared for. Examples of positive actions include: Repairing damaged property quickly. Removing graffiti. Cleaning parks and public spaces. Maintaining good lighting and landscaping. Criticisms Some researchers and community leaders argue that: Crime is influenced by many factors, including poverty, education, employment, and social conditions. Simply fixing physical problems does not always reduce crime. Focusing too heavily on minor offenses can sometimes lead to unfair treatment of certain groups. Key Takeaway The Broken Windows Theory suggests that: Taking care of small problems early can help prevent larger problems later. Whether applied to neighborhoods, businesses, or even personal habits, the idea emphasizes the importance of maintenance, attention, and community pride.

Susan Wright and Trish Peck were appointed by the board of directors to fill 2 seats that were vacated when those directors resigned for personal reasons.

Vince and Colleen were illegally appointed to prevent the scheduled nominations and election in 2026.

Key fact: Board appointments cannot replace an election that is already scheduled

Under Florida Statute 718.112(2)(d), a board may appoint someone only to fill a vacant seat until the next election.

That phrase is important:

“…until the next regular election.”

If your association already noticed an election, sent out ballots, or announced the annual meeting date, then:

✔ The election must still occur

✔ Owners still have the right to vote

✔ Appointments cannot override or cancel the election

✔ Appointed directors serve only until the election, not instead of it

A president cannot legally declare:

  • “No need for nominations”

  • “No need for an election”

  • “I already appointed people”

  • “We’re skipping the vote”

Those statements contradict the statute and almost certainly your bylaws.

 

🧨 Second issue: Appointing two people days before an election is a red flag

Appointments are meant for unexpected vacancies, not for replacing the democratic process.

If two seats were vacant, the board could appoint temporary directors — but:

❗ Those appointees must step aside at the election

❗ Owners must still vote for those seats

❗ The president cannot block nominations or ballots

❗ The board cannot “convert” temporary appointees into elected directors

This is exactly the kind of maneuver the DBPR views as election interference.